Modern film viewing audience desire to see rapid-fire action, a simple secret plan and a batch of particular effects. In the last few old age the most successful movies were the large budget movies, with a batch of detonations and beautiful actresses. Of course, we can't criticise a individual for what movies he or she wishes and disfavors but the movies of existent quality offering more than dramatic detonations and beautiful women.
For example, in the early years of the film industry, there weren't no particular personal effects owed to the fact that engineering was just beginning to develop. Back in the old days, movies had a complex and intelligent plot; in those years you judged a film by how well the histrions performed, how good the secret plan was; nowadays, people justice movies by the measure of trinitrotoluene used, the computing machine generated particular personal effects used, the figure of misses that are in the film and let's not bury that a good film must have got a secret plan as simple as it can be. I'm not saying that all modern movies are bad, but let's be frank, most of them have got got these ingredients, and you can't fault the manufacturers because if the audience desires to see one of the mentioned, you have to give them that so that they can do a pretty buck.
Getting back to old movies, in those days, there weren't any computers, no particular effects; it came down to the actors, which in my sentiment are the most of import portion in a movie. Let's not bury that achromatic and achromatic movies have got a particular expression which can't be establish in today's computerised movies. It took difficult work to do a film back in the days, it took even old age to do some of the movies in comparing to present, when movies are made on a regular basics. To fully comprehend this facet I have got two questions: What auto would you buy? A auto manually built or a auto which was made in a few hours by robots? Which is of more than quality? The reply is obvious, at least in my opinion: the manually built one because it is far better, of greater quality.
It is the exact state of affairs with movies; if you see a computerised film that agency you have got seen them all, they are all the same in comparing with classic movies which are different because every producer, manager came with something new, something that hasn't been seen before, that is manner movies were interesting because not only manufacturers but also histrions struggled to give their best to pull film fans.
Some illustrations of great movies that all film partisans mustn't lose are :
2. "Gone With The Wind";
3. "Mr. Ian Smith Goes To Washington";
4. "Sunset Boulevard";
5. "It Happened One Night" and others as well.
These 5 movies are classics: great actors, great performances, great producers, everything is great about these movies.
Some of you probably don't like old movies; I have got got some piece of advice: seek watching the colorized versions of some classic movies, you might change your head about these movies; these movies have a batch to offer, give them a try, I can guarantee you that you won't repent watching Gone With The Wind, for example.
All things considered, most of the old movies are of very high quality with the speech pattern set on the histrions not on the particular personal effects which in those years were inexistent. Don't acquire me wrong, some of today's movies are great but most of them can't be compared to the old movies like Aelfred Hitchcock's " The Birds" or Max Ernst Lubitsch's "Trouble In Paradise".